U.S.-Russia Rift Threatens Syria Talks

A conference called by special envoy Kofi Annan to end the Syria crisis appeared on the brink of failure as it opened Saturday, with the U.S. and Russia still divided over a role for President Bashar al-Assad in a transition government.

Mr. Annan seemed confident of his plan a few days ago, but Russia has refused to back a provision that would call for Mr. Assad to step down to make way for a unity government, a stance that could scuttle the entire deal.

The envoy warned the permanent members of the United Nations Security Council—Britain, China, France, Russia and the U.S.—that if they fail to act at the talks hosted by the U.N. at its European headquarters in Geneva they face an international crisis of “grave severity” that could spark violence across the region and provide a new front for terrorism.

“History is a somber judge and it will judge us all harshly if we prove incapable of taking the right path today,” he said.

He appeared to specifically aim his words at Russia, Syria’s most important ally, protector and arms supplier, which insists that outsiders can’t order a political solution for Syria. The U.S. is adamant that Mr. Assad shouldn’t be allowed to remain in power at the top of the transitional government and there is little chance that the fragmented Syrian opposition would go along with any plan that doesn’t explicitly say Mr. Assad must go.

“While many spoke of united support for one…some simultaneously took national or collective initiatives of their own, undermining the process. This has fueled uncertainty in Syria, in turn fueling the flames of violence,” Mr. Annan said. “By being here today, you suggest the intention to show that leadership. But can you, can we follow through?”

He said that “the way things have been going thus far, we are not helping anyone. Let us break this trend and start being of some use.”

Foreign ministers, diplomats and aides and envoys from Europe, Turkey and three Arab countries representing groups within the Arab League attended the talks.

A senior U.S. official said the “discussions remain challenging. We’re continuing to work this today, but we need a plan that is strong and credible. We may get there, we may not.”

The question is still whether Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton can rescue Mr. Annan’s plan.

Russia and China, which has followed Moscow’s lead on Syria, have twice used their council veto to shield Syria from U.N. sanctions.

Regional players Iran and Saudi Arabia weren’t invited. The Russians objected to the Saudis, who support the Syrian opposition. The U.S. objected to Iran, which supports Mr. Assad’s regime. Mr. Lavrov predicted the meeting had a “good chance” of finding a way forward, despite the grim conditions on the ground.

Syria, verging on a full-blown civil war, has endured a particularly bloody week, with as many as 125 people reported killed nationwide on Thursday alone. Since March 2011, the uprising in one of the world’s most unstable regions has killed some 14,000 people.

Syrian troops regained control of a rebellious Damascus suburb after a 10-day assault that left dozens dead, hundreds wounded and caused a humanitarian crisis, activists said Saturday.

The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights and local activist Mohammed Saeed said troops recaptured Douma outside the capital late Friday.

International tensions also heightened last week after Syria shot down a Turkish warplane, prompting Turkey to set up antiaircraft guns on its border.

Without agreement among the major powers on how to form a transitional government for the country, Mr. Assad’s regime—Iran’s closest ally—would be emboldened to try to remain in power indefinitely, and that would also complicate the U.S. aim of halting Iran’s nuclear goals.

At talks Friday night, top U.S. and Russian diplomats remained deadlocked over the negotiating text to agree on guidelines and principles for “a Syria-led transition.”

British Foreign Secretary William Hague urged Russia and China to join Western nations in speaking with one voice on Syria, though he acknowledged that will be a stiff challenge.

Mr. Hague noted that U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon told diplomats that a U.N. monitoring mission in Syria would have to be pulled back if no diplomatic solution is found.

“We haven’t reached agreement in advance with Russia and China—that remains very difficult. I don’t know if it will be possible to do so. In the interest of saving thousands of lives of our international responsibilities, we will try to do so,” Mr. Hague said. “It’s been always been our view, of course, that a stable future for Syria, a real political process, means Assad leaving power.”

The head of the struggling U.N. observer mission, Norwegian Maj. Gen. Robert Mood, has described the 300 monitors approved by the U.N. Security Council to enforce a failed April cease-fire as being largely confined to bureaucratic tasks and phoning Syrians because of the dangers on the ground. Their mandate expires on July 20.

The negotiating text for the multinational conference calls for establishing a transitional government of national unity, with full executive powers, that could include members of Mr. Assad’s government and the opposition and other groups. It would oversee the drafting of a new constitution and elections.

But the text that would serve as the framework for Mr. Annan’s peace efforts also would “exclude from government those whose continued presence and participation would undermine the credibility of the transition and jeopardize stability and reconciliation.”

“Ultimately, we want to stop the bloodshed in Syria. If that comes through political dialogue, we are willing to do that,” said Khalid Saleh, a spokesman for the Syrian National Council, a coalition of Syrian opposition groups based in Istanbul. “We are not willing to negotiate (with) Mr. Assad and those who have murdered Syrians. We are not going to negotiate unless they leave Syria.”

On Thursday, Ms. Clinton said in Riga, Latvia, that all participants in the Geneva meeting, including Russia, were on board with the transition plan. She told reporters that the invitations made clear that representatives “were coming on the basis of (Annan’s) transition plan.”

The United Nations says violence in the country has worsened since a cease-fire deal in April, and the bloodshed appears to be taking on dangerous sectarian overtones, with growing numbers of Syrians targeted on account of their religion. The increasing militarization of both sides in the conflict has Syria heading toward civil war.

Source: The Wall Street Journal

This entry was posted in Article & News and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

0 Responses to U.S.-Russia Rift Threatens Syria Talks

  1. Alfredo says:

    At least the U.S.G. and Obama agree that Al Assad is not the legitimate leader in Syria and that he must go ,which is, what the Syrian majority is fighting for, in their country.

    At least the U.S.G. admits that the U.N. security council has been a total failure for Syria.

    What Russia thinks is just a big matter if a third conflict arises from the Assad madness.

    We just want to see the end of Assad and not the start of something favorable for Russia in Syria except for free trade conditioned by the Transitional Syrian Council which this article makes no mention of.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>